Among regions primary energy supply opportunities vary greatly in the scenarios, with some regions having a much wider range of options than others. This global result was echoed in the regional reviews. NAM has the widest range of possibilities - wider even than the world as a whole. While recognizing this range of possibilities, the NAM regional review nonetheless expressed clear preferences for ``middle-of-the-road'' energy development avoiding extreme reliance on particular resources and technologies, whether focused on coal, nuclear, or renewables. The WEU regional review also preferred a diversity of energy sources, especially to limit import dependence.
At the other end of the spectrum, for MEA all six scenarios are largely dominated by oil and gas, and the regional review identified a clearly preferred scenario: the high-growth, oil- and gas-intensive Scenario A1. Similarly, PAO, as a high-income region with an outstanding record of promoting improved conservation, efficiency, and diversification beyond fossil fuels, is the region best positioned for a high-growth transition beyond fossil fuels (i.e., Scenario A3). This global conclusion was largely shared by the regional review. Given PAO's importance as a source of Asian investment, and the importance of early investments, PAO's choices are likely to exert a strong influence on the future of other Asian regions.