06 December 2013
Although climate change impacts have been modeled in one-off assessments, impacts frequently extend beyond the climate system itself, affecting both environmental and socioeconomic systems.
One way to pull together information across such a broad field is to compare the results from different models that address a specific question. Scientists have already performed model intercomparisons for the physics of the climate system, the economy of climate protection, and climate impacts on specific sectors.
The new Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP) is the first to produce state-of-the-art climate impact studies with the focus on climate change effects on human beings. ISI-MIP is a collaboration between IIASA and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), with backing from Working Groups II and III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It relies on the research framework of the Representative Concentration Pathways Options and the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (see Options, summer 2012), which IIASA played a large role in developing, and its organization is based on the Water Model Intercomparison Project (WaterMIP), in which IIASA Director and Chief Executive Officer Professor Dr. Kabat is involved. According to PIK Director, John Schnellnhuber, this comprehensive and rigorous model inter-comparison will "help to fill a sore gap in the IPCC’s report,” and in future research.
One of the systems examined by ISI-MIP research is water. It is known that as the planet warms, a growing number of people globally will be affected by severe reductions in water resources. Others will also experience increases in average water availability, due to higher or more frequent precipitation.
What we don’t know with any degree of certainty is: How much warmer will the climate become? How many more people will be affected? How severely will water resources be reduced? How much more water will be available? How great will the adverse effects be? And
where, geographically, will water deficits or surpluses occur?
A series of papers on every aspect of climate impacts was recently published in a special issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), co-edited by Schellnhuber, Kabat, and Frieler. More details about some of the studies in that issue can be found below.
The water sector impacts assessment, published recently in the PNAS special issue, integrated 16 models—applying the synthesized output from nine global hydrological models (GHMs), one global land surface model, and one dynamic global vegetation model, and using forcing from five general circulation models (GCMs). Scientists from Austria, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States took part, including IIASA’s Kabat, and the research ties into IIASA’s new Water Futures and Solutions initiative.
The study indicates that climate change is likely to considerably exacerbate regional and global water scarcity. For each additional degree of warming up to 2ºC above the present, an additional 7% of the global population will be confronted with a severe decrease in water resources. Climate change will also increase the number of people living under absolute water scarcity—less than 500m3/capita/year—by 40 to 100% compared to the effect of population growth alone.
The study shows a steep increase in some indicators of moderate impacts, between the present?day average temperature and 2ºC, while indicators of very severe impacts increase unabated beyond the 2ºC level.
The study highlights large uncertainties associated with these estimates, with both GCMs and GHMs contributing to the spread. GHM uncertainty is particularly dominant in many regions affected by declining water resources, suggesting that hydrological models must be further developed to improve water resource projections.
Ten percent of people are likely to live in a climate impact hotspot by century’s end, if greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated, according to a second ISI-MIP study also featured in the PNAS special issue on climate impacts. Many more are put at risk in a worst-case scenario of the combined impacts on crop yields, water availability, ecosystems, and health. The Amazon, Mediterranean, and East Africa are regions that might experience
severe change in multiple sectors. Pictured below, a deserted drought-struck village in Mauritania, a potential hotspot of climate impacts.
A third important project featured in the PNAS special issue examines how climate change will affect agricultural production, and thus food cost and availability. Past studies of climate change effects on agriculture produced substantially different results because of model, scenario, and data differences.
IIASA researchers working on AgMIP, a collaborator with the ISIMIP project, compared potential scenarios for future agricultural production using a variety of climate, crop, and economic models and identified gaps and inconsistencies. AgMIP aims improve substantially the characterization of world food security due to climate change and to enhance agricultural adaptation capacity in both developing and developed countries.
The project will also feature in a special issue of the journal Agricultural Economics.
Text by Kathryn Platzer
Last edited: 17 March 2014
IIASA and the IPCC
Read more about IIASA research on climate change impacts, adaptation, and mitigation.
Read this issue of Options
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
Phone: (+43 2236) 807 0 Fax:(+43 2236) 71 313